|
 |
 |
|
FY
2003 - 04 Funding |
|
|
|
Great
Lakes |
FY 2003 - 2004 Great Lakes National Program Office Funding
Guidance [previous]
[next]
USEPA-GLNPO REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS*
1. General Request
A. Contaminated Sediments
- $900,000 targeted for 8 to 12 projects. USEPA’s
Great Lakes National Program Office requests Proposals for funding,
technical support, and vessel support to assist contaminated
sediment work in priority geographic areas in the Great Lakes.
GLNPO's emphasis and ultimate objective is to assist in bringing
about remediation of contaminated sediments at these sites. GLNPO
WILL NOT FUND BASIC RESEARCH FOCUSING ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF
TECHNOLOGIES FOR TREATING CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS.
We are particularly interested in the following projects:
- sediment assessments [chemical (including Great Lakes
Binational Toxics Strategy priority pollutants), physical,
biological] to better map contamination at a site.
- sediment assessments to support the development of remedial
alternatives pursuant to the Great Lakes Legacy Act.
- conduct evaluations of remedial alternatives for sites moving
toward remediation pursuant to the Great Lakes Legacy Act.
- data collection to support a review of the short-term and
long-term effects of remedial alternatives on human health and the
environment
- beneficial re-use of sediments, including associated human and
ecological risk.
- monitoring/assessment projects focusing on post-remedial
investigations.
- on the ground sediment remediation.
- demonstrations of innovative sediment treatment technologies
and innovative sediment assessment techniques.
Projects should include an education outreach component. The
specific needs and priorities of Lakewide Management Plans and
geographic initiatives such as the Remedial Action Plans for Areas
of Concern will be considered in evaluations, particularly:
- Lake Erie and the St. Clair/Lake St. Clair/Detroit River basin
.
Projects addressing the chemicals associated with the beneficial
use impairments as identified by the Lake Erie LaMP (PCBs,
mercury, PAHs, lead, chlordane, dioxins, DDE/DDT, mirex), with
priority given to projects involving PCBs and mercury.
Lake Huron basin. Projects investigating contaminated
sediment in the Tittibawassee and Saginaw Rivers and Saginaw Bay,
including the characterization, mapping, or modeling the transport
of sediment and flood plain soil contamination with an emphasis on
dioxin like compounds.
Lake Ontario, St. Lawrence River, and Niagara River basins.
Projects which address the critical pollutants as identified in
the 1998 Stage I Lake Ontario LaMP and/or the Niagara River Toxics
Management Plan and projects which remediate sediments in Areas of
Concern.
Lake Michigan basin. Projects for (i) the possible
beneficial reuse of contaminated sediments and (ii) tools and
models for public education and involvement in sediment cleanups
and sediment pollution prevention plans.
Lake Superior basin. In the Lake Superior basin, high
priority will be placed on projects addressing the St. Louis River
or St. Mary’s River Areas of Concern and their directives to
remove impairments of beneficial uses. In addition, we are
particularly interested in projects on the following three sites:
1) Ashland/NSP Lakefront Site in Wisconsin; 2) Stamp Sands of
Keweenaw Peninsula, MI; and 3) Boyd Creek Site, WI. We are also
interested in sampling and routine monitoring projects associated
with the tributaries of Lake Superior, especially those with
upstream industrial or other activities.
Project Selection Criteria. GLNPO's Proposal evaluation will
seek a balance among sediments activities, focusing on on-the-ground
cleanup, assessment and characterization of sediment sites, and
evaluation of remedial alternatives. Proposals will be evaluated
using the descriptions of the requested projects, the General
Criteria, and the following Specific Criteria:
- Availability and assessment of baseline conditions for
remediation Proposals.
- Likelihood that remedial measures, including enforcement, will
result.
- Public outreach component of activity.
Contact: Marc Tuchman (312-353-1369/
tuchman.marc@epa.gov )
B. Pollution Prevention and
Reduction (Binational Toxics Strategy) - $500,000 targeted for
8-15 projects. GLNPO requests Proposals for pollution
prevention, reduction or elimination projects, with an emphasis on
substances which are persistent and toxic, especially those which
bioaccumulate, in the Great Lakes basin.
Priority will be given to those projects that support the goals
of the US-Canada Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy (GLBTS). See
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/bns/strategy.html. The Strategy
establishes reduction challenges for twelve "Level I" persistent
toxic substances: alkyl-lead, benzo(a)pyrene [B(a)P],
hexachlorobenzene (HCB), dioxins and furans, mercury,
octachlorostyrene (OCS), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and five
canceled pesticides (aldrin/dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, mirex, and
toxaphene). The US has also identified "Level II" substances for
pollution prevention activities: 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene;
1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene; pentachlorobenzene; hexachlorobutadiene;
and hexachlorocyclohexanes.
We are particularly interested in the following projects:
- Source characterization: Assessment of potential sources of
persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances.
- Indicators of progress toward virtual elimination of
persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances.
- Proper disposal of persistent bioaccumulative toxic
substances.
- Foster adoption of innovative products that would reduce the
use and release of persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances and
that are consistent with the principles of EPA’s
Environmentally-Preferable Purchasing Program (see
http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/epp ).
- Implementation of projects/actions delivering toxic
reductions/pollution prevention in sectors targeted by the GLBTS.
Expected environmental outcomes must be quantified.
- Foster adoption of green technologies. In this context, green
technology involves reducing or eliminating the use or generation
of persistent bioaccumulative toxic substances - including
feedstocks, reagents, solvents, products and byproducts-during
design, manufacture and use of chemical products and processes.
- Outreach to achieve source reductions from targeted sectors or
groups, e.g., designing a campaign for educating the XX industry
on ways to reduce usage and releases of YY chemical.
Project Selection Criteria. Proposals will be evaluated using
the descriptions of the requested projects, the General Criteria,
and the following Specific Criteria. GLNPO will favor Proposals for
projects which:
- Are listed above.
- Include an evaluation of the potential reductions of
pollutants in the environment
- Jointly target common goals under the Great Lakes Binational
Toxics Strategy and the LaMPs.
The specific needs and priorities of Lakewide Management Plans
and geographic initiatives such as the Remedial Action Plans for
Areas of Concern will be considered in evaluations, particularly:
- Lake Erie and St.Clair/Lake St. Clair/Detroit River basins.
Projects addressing the chemicals associated with the beneficial
use impairments as identified by the Lake Erie LaMP (PCBs,
mercury, PAHs, lead, chlordane, dioxins, DDE/DDT, mirex) with
priority given to projects involving PCBs and mercury or which
reduce the release of atrazine to the waters of Lake Erie.
Lake Ontario, St. Lawrence River and Niagara River basins.
Projects which:
(i) address pollutants identified in the 1998 Stage I Lake Ontario
LaMP (PCBs, DDTs, mercury, mirex, dieldrin, dioxins), and emerging
toxics such as PBDE as well as projects along the Niagara River
which address the priority toxics identified in the Niagara River
Toxics Management Plan.
(ii) reduce mercury or other pollutants by building upon, or
initiating projects similar in concept to auto mercury switch/
thermometer replacement; mercury collections from medical
situations; electronic equipment and pesticide collections and
education; demonstrate innovative technologies for control of
pollutant loadings from the watershed.
Lake Michigan Basin. Innovative, demonstration projects
which:
(i) address dioxin and other pollutants formed from "burning trash
in barrels."
(ii) further agricultural clean sweep efforts.
(iii) collect and phase out PCB and Mercury.
(iv) prevent pollution from pesticides, including substitution
projects.
Lake Superior Basin. Projects which characterize sources
and the indicators of progress toward zero discharge in the Lake
Superior basin and otherwise address the main joint priorities of
the Lake Superior Workgroup and the Lake Superior Forum. These
include projects which:
(i) address the top mercury commitments of the LaMP, including
workshops; education/outreach; abandoned white goods containing
mercury and PCBs; and taconite mercury treatability.
(ii) address other LaMP mercury commitments such as mercury
reduction of the main sources of environmental release in the Lake
Superior basin: energy production (electric utility sector),
taconite mining and ore processing, mercury releases at wastewater
treatment facilities, and mercury releases from landfills, in
order to meet the chemical load reduction schedules set in the
Lake Superior Stage II LaMP document.
(iii) enhance burn barrel outreach and education, especially in
the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
(iv) otherwise address the chemicals identified as critical
pollutants; PCBs, dioxins, DDT and metabolites, toxaphene,
chlordane, aldrin/dieldrin, mercury, hexachlorobenzene and
octachlorostyrene.
(v) address in-basin load estimates of mercury, dioxin and
hexachlorobenzene that have a low degree of confidence but may
represent a significant portion of the load from the Stage 2 and 3
inventories (e.g., small incinerators, treated wood or mercury
products in the solid waste stream, and mercury release from
landfills and solid waste transfer stations).
(vi) provide demonstration projects that significantly reduce
non-point loadings of critical and other pollutants originating
from the development of previously undeveloped land such as new
parking lots and highway construction.
(vii) address the long-range transport of atmospheric pollutants
to Lake Superior, especially those projects developed in
conjunction with other international efforts - i.e., the United
Nations Committee for Environmental Cooperation.
Lake Huron basin. Priority pollutants for pollution
prevention and reduction efforts in Lake Huron include PCBs,
Chlordane, Dioxin, and Mercury. Proposals are also requested that
demonstration innovative approaches to address the long-range
transport of atmospheric pollutants to Lake Huron.
Contacts: Ted Smith (312-353-6571
smith.edwin@epa.gov )
Further information: Please see
http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/p2.html
Please note: The Specific Request for Proposals for LaMP/RAP
Development and Implementation also requests pollution prevention
and reduction Proposals for Lake Superior.
C. Habitat (Ecological) Protection and
Restoration - $760,000 targeted for 8 to 15 projects. USEPA’s
Great Lakes National Program Office requests Proposals for projects
that demonstrate practices and tools for protecting and restoring
aquatic, terrestrial, and wetland ecosystems. Applicants should note
that acquisition projects will not be considered.
Basinwide Proposals having large-scale ecological implications
for the Great Lakes ecosystem, and multi-organizational, binational
partnerships are encouraged. Regional Proposals must be consistent
with Lakewide Management Plan (LaMP) priorities described below,
with Tribal priorities, or with regional ecological protection and
restoration planning effort priorities. Local or site-specific
Proposals must implement techniques that demonstrate protection and
restoration measures or the need for standard protection and
restoration techniques, and define expected outcomes.
Project Selection Criteria. GLNPO’s evaluation process for
ecological protection and restoration Proposals will seek a balance
among basinwide, regional, and local projects. Proposals will be
evaluated using the descriptions of the requested projects, the
General Criteria, and the following Specific Criteria. The following
Specific Criteria will also be considered in basinwide, regional and
local Proposal reviews. Because each Proposal is reviewed from a
holistic perspective, not every criteria needs to be present for a
project to be selected. However, projects that meet more than one
criteria will have a greater chance for success. The Specific
Criteria for ecological protection and restoration are:
- Biological importance on a regional, basinwide or global
scale.
- Project activities will test new techniques or approaches to
ecological protection and restoration.
- Positive impact of the expected environmental results
identified by the applicant.
- Effectiveness of education and outreach component.
- Potential for formation of new, multi-organizational,
binational partnership(s).
- A significant number of acres of aquatic, riverine, wetland,
and terrestrial habitat is protected or restoration efforts begun.
In addition, special consideration will be given to Proposals for
the following projects at the basinwide, regional, and local scales:
Basinwide:
- Organize a multi-organizational, binational partnership that
proposes to begin protection and restoration activities on an
ecosystem currently lacking overarching, strategic management.
Components of the project could include species and ecological
community inventories, conducting ecological assessments, building
on State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference (SOLEC) indicators,
monitoring, or strategic planning. The Great Lakes Coastal Wetland
Consortium (
http://www.glc.org/wetlands/)
and the International Alvar Initiative (http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/ecopage/alvar/)
are two examples of existing GLNPO-funded multi-organizational
partnerships. Examples of ecosystem types currently lacking
overarching, strategic management are Great Lakes islands, sand
dunes, and inland wetlands.
Organize a multi-organizational, binational partnership to
address habitat fragmentation as it relates to species and
ecological community movement in response to climatic changes
and/or land use pressures.
Regional:
Lake Erie Basin
- Refine or develop LaMP and State of the Lakes Ecosystem
Conference (SOLEC) indicators for Lake Erie species and habitats.
- Monitor and measure the results of projects listed in the Lake
Erie LaMP.
Lake Ontario, St. Lawrence River Basin, Niagara River Basin.
- The highest priority project for Lake Ontario is developing a
framework for a habitat prioritization strategy which would
be used to target future habitat restoration and conservation.
Proposals for such a framework, or early stages of such a
framework would be considered, including development of an
inventory of all past and ongoing assessment, restoration, and
conservation projects being carried out by all agencies and
environmental groups working in the Lake Ontario basin. The
inventory would include: (i) a synthesis of findings from these
projects, for each habitat type (for example, through the
construction of GIS maps, or the modification of existing maps,
for each habitat type that includes the location and condition of
existing habitats and the location of past and present habitat
restoration and conservation projects); (ii) a gap analysis that
can be used to target future assessment projects; and (iii) the
identification of vital habitats that can be used to prioritize
and target future restoration or conservation efforts. $60,000
has been specifically set aside for 1-2 prioritization strategy
projects, and additional money from this category could be made
available.
- Address the loss of fish and wildlife habitat in these
watersheds, including the identification and assessment of
existing habitat types (nearshore, coastal, open water, etc.)
- Restore, conserve or enhance vital habitats.
- Gather information leading to development of additional Lake
Ontario LaMP ecosystem indicators and measures for appropriate
wildlife species or habitat.
Lake Michigan Basin
- Demonstrate, in the coastal area of the lake or major
tributaries, ecological restoration of brownfields and other
degraded habitats; prioritization and planning of local
restoration activities that utilize and/or add to Lake Michigan
habitat data; and in urban areas, the utilization of the Chicago
Wilderness biodiversity recovery plan model.
- Protect and/or restore wetlands and other nearshore features
important to the health and spawning of Lake Michigan aquatic
species, including development of plans for conservation buffers
and dune protection.
Lake Superior Basin
- Protect or restore stream/tributary habitat so as to produce a
healthy tributary environment, including the restoration of both
the land and water interface. Projects should be connected to a
monitoring and evaluation project.
- Promote the achievement of Great Lakes Fishery Commission fish
community objectives, including the identification of critical
habitat for key fish species which will allow development of
quantitative goals for self-sustaining fish stocks; and the
development of a standardized monitoring program to evaluate the
status of the pelagic fish community of Lake Superior.
- Implement multi-jurisdictional restoration or protection
watershed or forest stewardship management plan recommendations.
- Restore lost or degraded ecological components or processes in
Lake Superior forest communities.
- Make available local sources of plant material (seeds or
seedlings) for restoration or vegetation management projects.
- Protect or restore rare ecological communities (e.g., pine
barrens).
Lake Huron Basin
- Assessment of the biodiversity of Lake Huron’s nearshore
habitat and the identification of protection and restoration
priorities.
- Investigate the impacts of dams and identify potential efforts
to restore natural flows and increase tributary fish spawning
habitat, including an analysis of management options for specific
dams, i.e., case studies.
- Demonstrate the connections between coastal marshes and
fishery and wildlife habitat in relationship to recent lake level
fluctuations.
- Assess off-shore reef habitat in Saginaw Bay and Tawas.
Local:
- Implement techniques that demonstrate on-the-ground habitat
protection or restoration in a particular locale.
- Show that habitat will actually be protected or restored at a
particular site.
- Define the relationship of the project to regional protection
and restoration efforts.
- Make an effort to include stakeholders in project planning or
implementation.
Contact: Karen Rodriguez, 312-353-2690,
rodriguez.karen@epa.gov
Please note:
- Lake Ontario Habitat Proposals are all intended to be
submitted under this RFP 1C.
- The Specific Request for Proposals for LaMP/RAP Development
and Implementation requests a specific Proposal for implementation
of habitat recommendations from the Habitat Plan for the Lower St.
Louis River RAP Lake Superior that is intended to be submitted
under RFP 2A.v.b.
- Following Proposal selection, Ecological Protection and
Restoration and other grants may be issued through an
"intermediary" organization which would make and administer grant
sub-awards. See RFP 4 for additional information.
- RFP 3 requests Proposals for ecological conferences,
workshops, meetings and reprints of education materials.
D. Invasive Species - $300,000
targeted for 4 to 8 projects. GLNPO requests Proposals to address
invasive (non-indigenous) aquatic and terrestrial species in the
Great Lakes Basin with an emphasis on prevention.
We are particularly interested in the following projects, with
the highest priority given to the first three topic areas:
- Development and demonstration of strong and innovative
programs to prevent the introduction of new invasive species
(aquatic or terrestrial) into the Great Lakes Basin.
- Development and demonstration of strong and innovative
programs to control the spread of invasive species within and from
the Great Lakes Basin.
- Documenting ecological impacts of invasive species on the
Great Lakes Basin food web.
- Documenting the economic impacts or potential economic impacts
of invasive species already in the Great Lakes Basin.
- Projects which identify chemical, physical, and biological
conditions that promote the establishment of invasive species.
- Development of innovative education/outreach projects.
Project Selection Criteria. GLNPO's Proposal evaluation will
consider priorities associated with invasive species for geographic
areas within the Great Lakes, particularly those of Lakewide
Management Plans; however, as funding for this category is limited,
emphasis will be placed on projects of Great Lakes Basin-wide
applicability. Proposals will be evaluated using the descriptions of
the requested projects, the General Criteria, and the following
Specific Criteria:
- Potential for project to benefit the Great Lakes ecosystem.
- Transferability across the Great Lakes Basin and beyond.
- Potential to advance government and private partnerships and
community involvement.
Contact: Marc Tuchman (312-353-1369/
tuchman.marc@epa.gov )
E. Strategic or Emerging Issues -
$260,000 targeted for 4 to 8 projects. In order to better
fulfill its mission under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
for the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and
biological integrity of the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem, GLNPO is
requesting Proposals for four to eight innovative Great Lakes
environmental projects which deal with strategic or emerging issues
of basin-wide importance.
We expect that projects in this area would:
- not fit neatly under other existing GLNPO funding categories
(i.e. Contaminated Sediments, Pollution Prevention, Ecological
Protections and Restoration, Invasive Species, or the specific
Proposals requested for LaMP and RAP implementation) but might
contain elements of one or more of those categories;
- address assessment, causes and/or effects of chemical or
biological pollutants not in the regulatory "mainstream;"
- cut across or overlap two or more of the foregoing areas; or
- address some other unanticipated area.
We especially encourage projects which identify and propose
solutions/mitigation for strategic or emerging issues of Great Lakes
Basin-wide applicability. Areas of particular interest include:
- Chemicals of potential environmental concern such as
polybrominated flame retardants, pharmaceuticals, and endocrine
disruptors.
- Causes and effects of observed changes in components of the
Great Lakes ecosystem (for example, nutrient loads; changes in
lower food web assemblages, including Mysis, Diporeia,
benthos and plankton; and effects of these change on the lake
fisheries).
- Linkages between changing conditions in the Great Lakes
ecosystem and human health.
- Social and economic issues affecting Great Lakes management
and environmental decision-making.
- Harnessing the innovation of market forces in environmental
protection via air or water emissions trading
Project Selection Criteria. The emphasis for this category is
projects of Great Lakes Basin-wide applicability. Proposals will be
evaluated using the descriptions of the requested projects, the
General Criteria, and the following Specific Criteria:
- Potential to further the restoration and maintenance of the
chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Great Lakes
Basin Ecosystem.
- Potential to achieve progress under the Great Lakes Strategy.
- Transferability across the Great Lakes Basin and beyond.
- Strategic importance, Great Lakes Basin-wide or Lake-wide as
applicable.
Contacts: Paul Horvatin (312-353-3612/
horvatin.paul@epa.gov )/Michael Russ (312-886-4013/
russ.michael@epa.gov )
* Dollar amounts and project numbers
are only Targets. See General
Considerations - Amounts, Targets, etc.
|